COOLflow Case Study 113
NRG's El Segundo Station Discovers COOLflow
Technology for Proven, Economical NOx Reduction
The Situation
 |
| |
El Segundo Station power plant in California |
NRG Energy explored its options for refurbishing
and retrofitting Units No. 1 and No. 2 at its El Segundo
Station power plant in California to increase energy
production and reduce emissions. In the midst of
unprecedented power volatility, investments for
upgrades to these units had to be minimal if this plant
was to remain economical to operate. In addition, the
State of California mandated reduced emissions levels for
this project. John Zink Company's TODD Combustion
Group recommended its premiere COOLflow modeling
technology - a cost-effective solution for optimizing
burner performance and achieving outstanding
emissions reduction.
The Boiler
Units No. 1 and No. 2 are Babcock & Wilcox
(B&W) front wall natural-gas fired boilers, each
designed to supply a 175 MW turbine with
approximately 1,140,000 lb/hr of superheated steam
at 1,990 psig and 1,000°F. The units are each equipped
with 16 original B&W register burners and four Over
Fire Air (OFA) ports located above each burner
column. However, the OFA ports were taken out of
service and instead staging was achieved by firing
through only 12 burners, with the top row of Burners
Out of Service (BOOS). This staging technique was
preferred due to airflow problems that caused
uncontrollable CO emissions when the OFA ports
were used. The use of BOOS instead of OFA was a
clear indication that the combustion process within
the furnaces had not been optimized.
The TODD® Solution
 |
| Fig. 1: |
COOLflow Physical Modeling |
After assessment of the units, baseline tests and
careful analysis, our burner engineers concluded that the
combustion performance could be dramatically
improved, and emissions significantly reduced, by
eliminating the airflow imbalances and placing the OFA
ports back into service. To design these cost-effective
retrofits for Units No. 1 and No. 2, the engineers
employed COOLflow modeling (Fig. 1) to design baffles
and turning vanes, which would be installed in the
windboxes and ductwork systems to correct airflow
distribution. These modifications would coincide with
other maintenance work intended to enable greater
power production by each unit. Implementing COOLflow
to optimize the combustion process would also allow the
existing OFA ports to be returned to service, reducing
both NOx and CO.
The TODD Result
Several discoveries were made during the modeling
process that revealed why the OFA ports were not used
for staging. The modeling engineers found that the
dampers which supplied air to the OFA ports were
undersized, resulting in low velocities and low furnace
penetration. The air trajectory through the OFA ports
was not straight into the furnace, which would allow for
effective mixing. Instead, the air exited the ports at a 45-
degree angle upward, leading to this air staying close to
the front wall and leaving the furnace without
sufficiently completing the combustion process.
As a result of the COOLflow technology retrofit,
NOx emissions on both units were reduced by an
average of 22%. (See Fig. 2.) The CO levels in the post-retrofit
tests were also significantly lower than
achieved during the baseline (pre-retrofit) tests, with a
5% reduction on Unit No. 1, and a 65% reduction on
Unit No. 2. During the post-retrofit test, it was also
demonstrated that the maximum load capability of
Unit No. 2 had been increased by 26 MWn (17%). In
fact, Unit No. 2 can now run at approximately 172
MWn with the same NOx level as the baseline test, an
increase in power output of 21 MWn (14%) without
additional emissions.
 |
| Fig. 2: NOx Reduction |


Back to top
|